On Friendship
The women who've shared my life — the ones who've seen me at my best and my worst — they know something the keyboard warriors don't. They know that I am not a symbol. Not a battleground. Not a question mark over anyone's rights or safety
Eighteen Years Out: On Friendship, "Madness," and the Women Who Saw Me Clearly
18 years ago this February, I came out as transgender. What followed was chaos, grief, reconciliation — and the closest friendships I've ever known. This is what nobody tells you.
I have been 'out' for eighteen years now.
February 2008. I walked into that uncertain future knowing almost nothing about what would happen next — and it showed. In the two years that followed I managed to dismantle most of my social life, make a complete hash of my private life, and generally demonstrate that there is, in fact, no instruction manual for any of this. None whatsoever. Whatever book you think exists, it doesn't.
But you learn as you go. And over time — slowly, painfully, imperfectly — I put my life back together. I made peace where peace was possible. I got married. Then, in one of fate's crueller twists, I was left. And here I am, officially retired but still quietly looking for work, having long since abandoned the person I was expected to become. No regrets. Well. Fewer regrets.
The Word Nobody Agrees On
People have called me mad. But here's the thing about that word — it means something different to everyone who uses it.
To some, mad is simply a blunt instrument. A verbal hammer used because, at root, they cannot abide transgender people, full stop. The word does no real work in their sentence; it is pure contempt with a label attached.
To others, mad is deployed casually, almost conversationally: Blimey, you'd have to be bonkers to do what you did. No malice intended — or at least, none aimed at my sanity. It's the kind of thing people say when they genuinely cannot fathom a life choice that isn't theirs. Curiosity dressed as shorthand.
And then there are those who question my emotional and sexual stability altogether. These people genuinely worry — or claim to — that I must be unstable, confused, somehow broken. To them I want to say: I am genuinely, quietly, contentedly me these days. And if that outcome troubles you, I genuinely cannot help you with that.
Suck it up, ya basses. 🙂
The Friendship Nobody Predicted
Here is what I have noticed, consistently, across all eighteen of those years: I have always been able to attract and maintain close cisgender female friendships. In fact, the majority of my closest friends are women — real women, in the battle-hardened sense that certain groups like to claim ownership of. (I only say cisgender to be precise, by the way; it's not a flag-waving exercise.)
I also have transgender friends, and good friends at that. But it is the cis women I want to talk about today, because something interesting always happens when I mention these friendships in certain spaces.
"You mean the handmaidens," comes the response. "Not true feminists. Brainwashed by the Patriarchy. Lack the critical faculties to see what's really going on."
I have heard it all. More than once.
The logic, such as it is, runs like this: anyone who does not share your particular analysis must, by definition, have been corrupted, fooled, or paid off. Disagreement is not the product of different experiences or genuine reasoning — it is evidence of betrayal. Sound familiar? It reminds me rather a lot of religious extremism, truth be told. The same structure. The same certainty. The same inability to conceive of the other side as anything other than enemy or fool.
How It Actually Works
But here is what my actual life looks like, in the actual world:
My women friends just like me. As I am. They know my aberrations and my faults — because nobody is a collection of virtues only. They've worked alongside me. They've shared toilets with me without a second thought. They've got drunk with me. Argued with me about things that mattered. Listened to my endless supply of trans anecdotes and jokes. And at the end of all of that, they still simply like me for who I am.
That. Is. That.
No ideological test. No loyalty oath. No subscription to a particular theory of gender. Just — acceptance. Human, messy, unremarkable, real. It's that simple. And I mean that literally: it is genuinely that uncomplicated, in my experience of living it.
The women who get closest to me tend to share one thing: they do not think of themselves as perfect. They've lived. They've struggled. They've got their own wounds and uncertainties. And somehow, that mess — that common-or-garden human imperfection — is exactly what allows them to extend genuine friendship to someone like me, rather than performing virtue from a safe ideological distance.
The Online Exception
That, dear hearts, is how my life mostly is. Quiet. Ordinary. Friendly.
Except, of course, online.
Here on Facebook — and I need not name the specific corners where this is worst — the keyboard warriors are already limbering up for action. Anonymous bile. Vehement condemnation. A certainty so absolute it could move mountains.
The irony I have noticed? I genuinely doubt most of them would behave that way if they met me in person. If they worked with me, sat next to me, heard my laugh, discovered we share a taste in films or a hatred of the same thing. Distance breeds contempt. It always has. And it is no accident that the people who know me least are often the most certain of their contempt.
But the women who've shared my life — the ones who've seen me at my best and my worst — they know something the keyboard warriors don't. They know that I am not a symbol. Not a battleground. Not a question mark over anyone's rights or safety.
I am just a person. A bit battered. A bit stubborn. Still here.
And that, after eighteen years, is more than enough.
Bea Groves-McDaniel | July 2026